Update on codes
Many issues have yet to be resolved before all 50 states adopt the unified version of the International Building Code.
Sal Fateen, President, MHMS -- Modern Materials Handling, 10/1/2001
In a previous article, I discussed the three model codes that are in use in all regions of the country. I also covered how the new, unified IBC 2000 (International Building Code) was created to solve eliminate the confusion across the different codes. Unfortunately, it hasn't happened yet.
Codes are usually adopted by the states and subsequently the specific municipalities, via a vote of the respective officials. It is now nearing the start of 2002 and several states have yet to adopt the new "unified code".
There are many reasons that several states have not yet adopted the new code. In fact, there are so many reasons that these states might well write their own codes. We could potentially have 50 different IBC code variations.
One of the more prominent states that still has not adopted the IBC 2000 is California. It is still operating under the 1997 UBC (Uniform Building Code). Ironically, California is where the ICBO (International Conference of Building Officials) is located, and home to the SEAOC (Structural Engineers Association of California), two organizations that played a very large role in the writing of the unified IBC 2000 standard.
California's reasons for lack of adoption include a desire for more local requirements. But more concerning is the lack of involvement of the NFPA (National Fire Protection Association) in the fire-related issues of the IBC 2000. Therefore, they are refusing to accept it as "their" code. Moreover, they formed a committee to consider authoring their own building code.
This article is not intended to paint a gloomy picture of the political turmoil around the new unified code. But it is important that you know the complete story and realize that many issues are not yet settled.
It is equally important to know that when it comes to materials handling operations, most states now require permits they did not previously require. One exception is California, which has been requiring permits since the late 1960's.
To help deal with this important shift, it is essential that the Rack Manufacturers Institute as well as chapters of MHMS remain involved in the process. This way the correct engineering information is part of the process, putting us on the road to code utopia.
Professional Activities is the official publication of the Materials Handling & Management Society.
For membership, access the Society's home page on the World Wide Web at www.mhia.org/mhms
or contact Bobbie Curtis, Executive Director of MHMS, by calling 704/676-1183. The address is 8720 Red Oak Blvd., Suite 201
Charlotte, NC 28217-3935
Talkback
Related Content
Related Content
There are no other articles related to this article.



















View All Blogs

