Login  |  Register          Subscribe to Modern Materials Handling and MHPN
Zibb
Subscribe to Modern Materials Handling and MHPN
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Hoping for the best, planning for the worst

Staff -- Modern Materials Handling, 9/1/2002

Just as armies test their readiness under fire while hoping they will never go to war, distribution center managers should plan out and test how they will react to events that could interrupt their supply chains.

A panel of logistics experts, including representatives from industry, the military and the American Red Cross, offered suggestions on how distribution centers could prepare for disaster at The Warehouse of the Future conference.

Managers should develop written plans that would aid in restoring normal operations as quickly as possible after disaster strikes, they said. Those plans should include contingencies for all of the major activities the DCs perform. Larger firms may find that they can shift distribution to centers that aren't directly affected by the disaster, but smaller companies will need to find other ways to get around problems, they said.

Keeping utilities up and running is another major concern for distribution centers. As a result, many companies are opting for backup generators and reserve water tanks to prevent interruptions in operations.

Companies should also establish relationships with backup suppliers in case the primary supplier is unable to meet its commitments due to a disaster, said the panel. This is especially important for just-in-time operations, where the proximity of a supplier can be as important as the price of products and components.

The availability of information is critical to a quick recovery, so care must be taken in the storage of information, they advised. Recovery plans should require critical data to be backed up in distant locations, and those plans also should specify procedures for retrieving the data if systems go down. The panelists also suggested that distribution centers should shut down systems to test their contingency plans once each quarter. One way to do that is by eliminating one key element at a time — for instance, a facility could test how it would substitute manual materials handling systems for automated systems.

Finally, the panelists shared their experiences in coping with disruptions caused by the events of September 11. They cautioned attendees against thinking that a similar disaster could happen only in a place such as New York City. Oklahoma City residents can tell you otherwise, they said, and natural disasters can occur anywhere.

Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

Sponsored Links


 
Advertisement
SPONSORED LINKS

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Webcasts

Blogs


Sorry, no blogs are active for this topic.

View All Blogs RSS
Advertisements





MODERN MATERIALS HANDLING NEWSLETTERS

Click on a title below to learn more.

Resource Center E-Alert (Monthly)
Modern Early Edition (Monthly)
Modern Best Practices Update (Monthly)
Modern Product Showcase (Occasional)
MHPN Product Alert (Monthly)
MHPN Product Showcase (Occasional)
About Us   |   Contact Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   FREE Subscriptions   ||   RSS
© 2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites