Login  |  Register          Subscribe to Modern Materials Handling and MHPN
Zibb
Subscribe to Modern Materials Handling and MHPN
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Best bets for productivity

CSCMP conference speakers recommend equipment and technology investments for increasing productivity in the warehouse.

By Corinne Kator, Associate Editor -- Modern Materials Handling, 10/24/2006

Does a warehouse management system (WMS) direct putaway and replenishment in your warehouse or DC? Do your employees wear mobile printers on their belts, printing labels only as they need them? Are you taking advantage of radio frequency (RF) technology?

If you answered “no” to any of these questions, you should consider the potential productivity gains of these technologies, Mike Honious, vice president of engineering at Ozburn-Hessey Logistics, told conference attendees. Honious, who previously worked as director of engineering at Gap, hosted a session on warehousing trends at the recent Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP) conference in San Antonio.

He told conference attendees he considers WMS-directed putaway, mobile printers and RF technology to be “low-hanging fruit”—smart technology investments that pay for themselves in less than a year.

Good technology investments with slightly longer payback periods, he says, include powered conveyor, pop-up wheel sortation and voice-directed picking technology.

Powered conveyor makes the list, he says, because it cuts employee travel time—a big factor when it comes to productivity. Honious says he likes pop-up wheel sortation because few DCs really need the speed of more expensive, more sophisticated sortation systems. And voice-pick technology can immediately generate a 15% return in productivity, he says.

Warehousing veteran Ken Ackerman also touted the benefits of voice-directed picking in his conference session on the fundamentals of warehousing. “In my opinion, the most important technology gain in warehousing is voice recognition technology,” Ackerman told conference attendees.

Neither Ackerman nor Honious showed enthusiasm for radio frequency identification (RFID) as a warehousing tool. “RFID is not cost effective for the warehouse operator,” says Ackerman, “and I don’t think I’ll live long enough to see it be cost effective.”

“Until the cost comes down,” says Honious, “you’re really not going to see RFID. Everybody’s talking about it; I’m not seeing it as a trend in the next year or two.”

Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

There are no other articles related to this article.

By This Author

Sponsored Links


 
Advertisement
SPONSORED LINKS

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Webcasts

Blogs

  • Bob Trebilcock
    Company Briefings

    May 15, 2008
    Pallets, pallets and more pallets
    Caveat emptor! That’s Latin for look twice at what this guy is selling. I bring up the phrase because I had a lengthy conversation t......
    More
  • Tom Andel
    Takeaways

    May 14, 2008
    Maybe tomorrow's employees won't be zombies
    There’s a new book out called The Dumbest Generation. Author Mark Bauerlein argues that today’s school-age kids may be technologically ......
    More
  • View All Blogs RSS

Webcasts


Advertisements





MODERN MATERIALS HANDLING NEWSLETTERS

Click on a title below to learn more.

Resource Center E-Alert (Monthly)
Modern Early Edition (Monthly)
Modern Best Practices Update (Monthly)
Modern Product Showcase (Occasional)
MHPN Product Alert (Monthly)
MHPN Product Showcase (Occasional)
About Us   |   Contact Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   FREE Subscriptions   ||   RSS
© 2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites