Subscribe to our free, weekly email newsletter!


Conveyor technology: Are you thinking differently?

With new distribution requirements and more investment in automation underway, Modern set out to find how readers are now approaching the use of conveyors and sortation systems.
By Bob Trebilcock, Executive Editor
April 01, 2013

What matters to readers
The old adage that you can’t manage what you don’t measure is beginning to be applied to conveyor and sortation systems. A third of respondents indicated they are now using metrics to assess their conveying systems. Most are using more than one metric. The most commonly cited include:

  • 71% are measuring maintenance costs
  • 66% are measuring error rates
  • 63% are measuring the man hours required to operate the facility
  • 59% are measuring the units moved on an hourly or daily basis
  • 59% are measuring time savings
  • 54% are measuring energy efficiencies.

Since conveyor and sortation systems are mission critical to a distribution center, respondents were asked what factors were most important in the purchase of a conveyor system. It comes as no surprise that ease of maintenance (98%), reliability (98%), price (98%), uptime (97%) and design flexibility (96%) were listed as very important or somewhat important.

At the same time, 54% say they are willing to pay more for reliability, 52% say they are willing to pay more for ease of repair and maintenance, and 51% say they are willing to pay more for design flexibility.

At the other end of the spectrum, only 29% are willing to pay extra for a quieter conveyor system and only 24% are willing to pay extra for faster lead times.

Since item-level handling, faster turnaround times and mixed SKU palletizing show every indication of increasing in use, Modern expects to see the adoption of more automation in the future. We will revisit these questions in next year’s survey to see how they are impacting conveyor and sortation going forward.

Read last year’s Conveyor Survey Results.

About the Author

Bob Trebilcock
Executive Editor

Bob Trebilcock, executive editor, has covered materials handling, technology and supply chain topics for Modern Materials Handling since 1984. More recently, Trebilcock became editorial director of Supply Chain Management Review. A graduate of Bowling Green State University, Trebilcock lives in Keene, NH. He can be reached at 603-357-0484.


Subscribe to Modern Materials Handling magazine

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Find out what the world’s most innovative companies are doing to improve productivity in their plants and distribution centers.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Recent Entries

American Logistics Aid Network mobilizes logistics partners to deliver supplies to difficult-to-reach areas.

In a fundamentally changed world, your approach to strategy, and your supply chain, must also change. Andrew Winston, author of The Big Pivot, discusses how business can profit from this fundamental change.

Voice-enabled work is one element in a broad management strategy to improve order accuracy, increase productivity, and reduce labor costs in the supply chain. This complimentary white paper is designed to help you speak the ROI language, and provides a calculation formula to present the performance and financial payback from a variety of voice-enabled applications.

Conveyor manufacturers revise growth estimate up from 2% to 5%.

Experienced executive joins provider of automated storage and retrieval systems.



© Copyright 2013 Peerless Media LLC, a division of EH Publishing, Inc • 111 Speen Street, Ste 200, Framingham, MA 01701 USA