MMH    Topics     News

Despite challenges, intermodal volumes post 4.5 percent Q1 annual gain, reports IANA


Latest Material Handling News

Heading into 2015, the intermodal sector was faced with the same challenges it had exiting 2014, namely the West Coast port labor disruption and harsh winter weather. But even with these obstacles volumes still managed to show overall growth on an annual basis, according to the most recent edition of the Intermodal Market Trends & Statistics Report from the Intermodal Association of North America (IANA).

First quarter total volume—at 3,853,661 containers and trailers— was up 2 percent annually, IANA reported. Domestic containers—at 1,568,581—were up 6.5 percent, and international containers—at 1,883,031—were down 0.4 percent. All domestic equipment at 1,970,630—was up 4.5 percent, and trailers fell 2.7 percent to 402,049.

On a month-by-month basis for the first quarter, the report noted that intermodal volumes rose 2.3 percent in January, followed by a 4.2 percent drop off in February, due to port-related issues out West, but volumes closed out the quarter strong with a 7.4 percent uptick.

“Aggregate intermodal volumes were actually a little better than we expected, given the monthly international volume fluctuations and the downturn in trailer shipments,” IANA President and CEO Joni Casey said. “Domestic container movements were the driver to these results.”

The negative volumes on the international side in the first quarter had a negative impact on overall intermodal volumes, with volumes off 4.3 percent in February and international loads down 10.8 percent. A better March did not improve the overall international volume situation for the first quarter.

“Port congestion was the main cause of the weak performance of international performance in Q1,” the report explained. “These disruptions prevented containers from being off-loaded from ships and transferred to rail cars for significant parts of Q1.”

Even though the international situation was bleak for the first quarter, IANA said there are brighter signs ahead for various reasons, including the U.S. economy expanding at the same pace it has for the last five years, with imports getting a boost from the strong U.S. dollar that helped to make imports cheaper. 

Taking that a step further, Casey said that there are indications that international will maintain a good portion (in the 5-to-7 percent range) of the growth that started to occur in March. But she pointed out that the international March numbers were directly related to the pent-up surge as congestion finally started to unwind.

The volume gains on the domestic side were strong and impressive, IANA said, in light of the “difficulties faced by the container import sector.” It added that the majority of domestic containers transport domestically-produced freight only, with a decent amount of domestic containers moving freight transloaded from a 40-foot container that came in through a port.  And IANA also said that there is some evidence that weaker transload volumes caused domestic container growth to slow slightly, too.

Looking ahead, FTR Senior Consultant Larry Gross told LM he expects decent near-term intermodal growth, as the West Coast backlog continues to be worked off, but he cautioned there could be issues later in the year due to currently adequate truck capacity, particularly if service does not improve. 


Article Topics

Events
IANA
Intermodal
Rail & Intermodal
Transportation
   All topics

News & Resources

Latest in Materials Handling

Beckhoff USA opens new office in Austin, Texas
Manhattan Associates selects TeamViewer as partner for warehouse vision picking
ASME Foundation wins grant for technical workforce development
The (Not So) Secret Weapons: How Key Cabinets and Asset Management Lockers Are Changing Supply Chain Operations
MODEX C-Suite Interview with Harold Vanasse: The perfect blend of automation and sustainability
Consultant and industry leader John M. Hill passes on at age 86
Registration open for Pack Expo International 2024
More Materials Handling

About the Author

Jeff Berman's avatar
Jeff Berman
Jeff Berman is Group News Editor for Logistics Management, Modern Materials Handling, and Supply Chain Management Review and is a contributor to Robotics 24/7. Jeff works and lives in Cape Elizabeth, Maine, where he covers all aspects of the supply chain, logistics, freight transportation, and materials handling sectors on a daily basis.
Follow Modern Materials Handling on FaceBook

Subscribe to Materials Handling Magazine

Subscribe today!
Not a subscriber? Sign up today!
Subscribe today. It's FREE.
Find out what the world's most innovative companies are doing to improve productivity in their plants and distribution centers.
Start your FREE subscription today.

Latest Resources

Materials Handling Robotics: The new world of heterogeneous robotic integration
In this Special Digital Edition, the editorial staff of Modern curates the best robotics coverage over the past year to help track the evolution of this piping hot market.
Case study: Optimizing warehouse space, performance and sustainability
Optimize Parcel Packing to Reduce Costs
More resources

Latest Resources

2023 Automation Study: Usage & Implementation of Warehouse/DC Automation Solutions
2023 Automation Study: Usage & Implementation of Warehouse/DC Automation Solutions
This research was conducted by Peerless Research Group on behalf of Modern Materials Handling to assess usage and purchase intentions forautomation systems...
How Your Storage Practices Can Affect Your Pest Control Program
How Your Storage Practices Can Affect Your Pest Control Program
Discover how your storage practices could be affecting your pest control program and how to prevent pest infestations in your business. Join...

Warehousing Outlook 2023
Warehousing Outlook 2023
2023 is here, and so are new warehousing trends.
Extend the Life of Brownfield Warehouses
Extend the Life of Brownfield Warehouses
Today’s robotic and data-driven automation systems can minimize disruptions and improve the life and productivity of warehouse operations.
Power Supply in Overhead Cranes: Energy Chains vs. Festoons
Power Supply in Overhead Cranes: Energy Chains vs. Festoons
Download this white paper to learn more about how both systems compare.