Lift Truck Series: Funding flexibility
Customers demand lease agreements that allow for change, reduce or eliminate penalties, and prevent surprises during or at the end of the term. Finance partners have responded by offering unprecedented flexibility and risk mitigation.
Equipment in the NewsISM semiannual report presents a positive outlook for manufacturing and non-manufacturing in 2018 Hyster-Yale acquires controlling interest in Zhejiang Maximal Forklift Co. Ltd. Top 20 industrial lift truck suppliers, 2017 ISM November data continues to show good growth momentum Chamberlain Group acquires Systems, Inc. More Equipment News
Equipment ResourceTop 20 industrial lift truck suppliers, 2017 The top lift truck suppliers list is changing with industry acquisitions causing a dramatic departure from the norm.
Lift truck users who have embraced the concept of total cost of ownership (TCO) can probably still recall the days when making sense of asset, labor and maintenance costs was a much foggier ordeal. Annual reviews of maintenance costs offered no visibility into each asset’s economic life and could not support accountability for operators or service providers. Utilization averages and other guesstimates led to lease structures based on specifications divorced from the actual application. As a result, unplanned expenses, end-of-term surprises and fire drills of all kinds were the norm, but seen as necessary expenditures in pursuit of sustained productivity.
In recent years, facilities have had a surge of interest in controlling and optimizing fleet costs. And even though it is understood that operator performance and maintenance practices can always be honed over time, the lease rate is assumed to be the one fixed number in the TCO equation. That is no longer the case, as dealers, manufacturers’ captive finance groups or other finance partners work with end-users to fine-tune equipment costs on a quarterly, monthly or as-needed basis—as opposed to 60-month intervals.
Rather than signing on the dotted line and hoping for the best, lift truck users are now able to use flexible leasing options to control costs on an ongoing basis. This approach can yield savings in lease payments as well as meaningful improvements in equipment uptime and productivity.
“The ongoing management of agreements requires finance partners to be present and engaged with the customer to ensure everything is OK and fix what’s not,” says Bill Buckhout, director of leasing and remarketing for Yale Materials Handling Corp., who emphasizes that the customer also has a responsibility to engage. “The practice of just dropping off equipment and waiting until the end of the lease term is much too common and very problematic for costs, relationships and productivity. A customer who does that is making a huge mistake. There are plenty who are very busy, but for the most effective equipment program, they have to stay engaged. There is no fix-and-forget solution.”
Preparing for productivity
Lease structures are becoming more flexible throughout the term, but it remains critically important to do plenty of homework in advance of entering into an agreement. The process should begin with assembling a team of stakeholders.
“Purchasers and operations personnel, ideally, should be in open communication where procurement outlines their challenges and what they want to control in terms of upfront costs and operations explains the impacts on their side,” says Eric Cleveland, financial services manager for Hyster. “We’ve seen this relationship evolve positively in light of telemetry and other tools they have to quantify and evaluate objectives. If they’re working hand in hand toward goals and have a plan in place throughout the lease and afterward, they will enjoy a successful partnership.”
Ultimately, disciplined collaboration can enable very precise cost management and performance benchmarking. Buckhout says the conversation was historically about an asset’s cost per hour, but that is now just the beginning.
“If you move one pallet per hour, cost per hour doesn’t measure productivity,” he says. “If you drill deeper, you can identify the cost per unit of measure moved, whether that’s cost per pallet move or per pick. It’s much more granular, and metrics today measure productivity.”
Whether or not advanced telematics and data-mining are used, it is essential that all stakeholders and finance partners have a comprehensive understanding of the application when structuring a lease. Buckhout says most customers do some rough math—two 8-hour shifts equals 16 hours of use per day—and end up buying too many hours.
“Others have been burnt by using equipment too much,” he says. “Even annual or semi-annual reviews should validate that the lease is on track. If you need more hours, renegotiate and buy more, don’t buy them up front. This will ensure the end-of-lease process is free from problems.”
Chris Craig, financial merchandising manager at Toyota Material Handling U.S.A., emphasizes the importance of a thorough site survey prior to proposal. “Some applications are abusive to the point that they wouldn’t qualify at all for a residual lease,” he says. “Others might not qualify for the highest residual, but there’s a middle ground category that balances payments and residuals and includes less stringent language for the equipment’s off-lease condition.”
A thorough survey can prevent under- or over-estimation and produce other specifications and clauses that can be incorporated into the lease contract. Provisions might allow for early returns with no penalty if business slows in year one, or they might codify the anticipated plan for end-of-term equipment purchases.
“It’s difficult to anticipate everything, but if you expect changes, you might sign a shorter lease with options to extend,” says Eric Gabriel, senior manager of marketing and sales support at Mitsubishi Caterpillar Forklift America. “A 60-month lease will offer the lowest payment, but a 36-month lease will grant added flexibility.”
Regardless of the lease term, Brian Markison, director of North American sales for UniCarriers, recommends every lease negotiation include a 12-month extension option. “If you have the ability to exercise that option, customers can make a decision at the end of the term if the lift truck is still solid,” Markison says, “and payments in that extended period will be lower than the base lease.”
For leases bundled with maintenance programs, Buckhout advises detailed negotiation in advance of signing. “‘Maintenance agreement’ is not a coverall term,” he says. “You can get something that covers everything—including abuse—or nothing but oil changes. If you use a lot of tires you might want to include them as a covered expense. If you use few, take them out of the agreement for those savings.”
As soon as the lease is finalized and the equipment is at work, changes will come. Data might reveal a reach truck’s usage involves more travel than lifting and that a pallet truck is more appropriate to the application. Alternatively, a lift truck might need greater height to optimally access storage locations. More commonly, a heavily used piece of equipment should be swapped with a lift truck with lower hours to ensure balanced fleet utilization and avoid end-of-term overages. Jeff Bailey, director of Crown Credit Co., says the range of potential adjustments to fleet composition is driving significant change in how finance partners deliver services.
“It’s forcing the leasing industry to adapt to those changes, which encourages customers to lease because it now allows them to do things they couldn’t do in the past,” Bailey says. “They’re pushing the risk to the leasing company since they don’t always know what their business or the economy will do. They need an out that’s not going to punish them if they need a different model or fewer lift trucks. Most captive lease companies are starting to play ball with that.”
In cases of extreme seasonality, a lease might be structured around quarterly or seasonal payment schedules, or skip invoices during months of particularly low use. Data might also suggest a low-use application is better served by a pre-owned or refurbished lift truck. Tim Combs, president of sales and marketing for The Raymond Corp., says leases are no longer only associated with new equipment, which can be particularly beneficial to medium- and small-sized businesses.
“Sometimes it seems that leasing alternatives are more appealing to smaller or mid-sized businesses, but the same advantages apply to big fleets, and we’ve seen greater interest in larger accounts than in the past,” Combs says. “At the end of the term, we take back the equipment and dispose of it in the best way possible for each unit.”
For those who purchase equipment, Combs says there is a hesitancy sometimes to get rid of it until it is “dead.” Aging equipment becomes more expensive to keep, and even if the customer recognizes a lift truck’s economic life is over, it’s not always easy to dispose of. “When the only choice is to scrap, it’s a matter of meeting environment guidelines for proper disposal,” he says. “Generally speaking, when a customer scraps a lift truck, the very best they can hope for is the scrap value will cover disposal costs, but it usually doesn’t.”
Equipment that is returned at the end of the term with some economic life remaining can be remarketed, Bailey says, which allows the supplier to make use of each unit in an ideal application. “Before, if we received equipment with a high residual value, we couldn’t easily sell it at a dollar amount that matched our investment, but now we could put it into a rental fleet or provide it directly to another user,” Bailey says. “That’s a barrier that used to be big, but we can now spread those costs and assets around by matching each piece of equipment with the specific application needs of each customer.”
As keen as lift truck users might be to focus on core competencies and offload fleet management, they must remain engaged with dealers, service providers and finance partners. Markison says this need not be an elaborate exercise and that periodic 30-minute reviews can help tremendously.
“There’s still a feeling that some don’t have the time, since the forklift is only there to support the primary business,” he says. “But you never want to neglect any input on cost structure. Management priorities are different from facility to facility, and the very good ones are more than excited to sit down and review fleet costs. The ones that really need the help tend to be a little out of control anyway and don’t want to meet because they have other fish to fry.”
A close relationship can help ensure customers and dealers are aware of the condition and hour meters of leased equipment. Dealers can also communicate damage issues so the customer can plan accordingly and work to mitigate the cause of damage and the related costs.
At the very least, the dealer can make a customer aware of damage charges, but they can also work to find creative ways to deal with those charges, according to Toyota’s Craig. For example, a dealer might build damage costs into the existing lease, or the agreement for replacement equipment. Leases bundled with full maintenance programs can further reduce costs while protecting the customer from risk.
“Some finance companies offer higher residuals for equipment leased with a full maintenance agreement, which can lower the lease rate by 10% or more,” Craig says. “One advantage of a full maintenance program is that the customer is assured the equipment is maintained properly, which increases uptime.”
Even if the lease structure and real-world utilization match up nicely throughout the term, many customers still struggle to make timely decisions at the end of the lease. As a result, they often end up in costly month-to-month renewals for equipment that should be replaced. Craig says lease customers should receive a notification six months before the end of the term, at which time planning can begin.
Companies mentioned in this article
• Crown Equipment
• Hyster Company
• Mitsubishi Caterpillar Forklift America
• The Raymond Corporation
• Toyota Material Handling U.S.A.
• UniCarriers Americas
• Yale Materials Handling Corporation
About the AuthorJosh Bond, Senior Editor Josh Bond is Senior Editor for Modern, and was formerly Modern’s lift truck columnist and associate editor. He has a degree in Journalism from Keene State College and has studied business management at Franklin Pierce University.
Subscribe to Modern Materials Handling Magazine!Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Find out what the world’s most innovative companies are doing to improve productivity in their plants and distribution centers.
Start your FREE subscription today!
Article TopicsBest Practices · Crown Equipment · Finance · Hyster · Lift Truck Series · Lift Trucks · March 2016 · Mitsubishi Caterpillar Forklift America · Raymond · Toyota Material Handling · UniCarriers · Yale · ·
10th Annual Salary Survey: The Price of Performance Let’s put Automatic Data Capture (ADC) Technology to Work View More From this Issue