MMH    Topics     News

Ongoing drop-off in coal leads to earnings declines for CSX


Latest Material Handling News

Jacksonville, Fla.-based CSX reported it had fourth quarter revenue of $2.781 billion, which was down 13 percent, or $411 million annually, with earnings per share of $0.48 off 2 percent annually and ahead of Wall Street estimates of $0.46 per share. The company cited various factors for the revenue decline, including pricing gains being offset by the impact of lower fuel recovery, total volume down 6 percent at 1.655 total units, and what the company said was a continued transition in its business mix.

CSX also said its total expenses dropped 13 percent, due largely to reduced fuel prices, lower volume-related costs and efficiency gains, which led to its 12 percent decrease in operating income at $791 million, although its operating margin fell saw a 20 basis point improvement to 71.6 Fourth quarter net earnings of $466 million were down 25 percent.

Full-year 2015 revenue at $11.8 billion was off 7 percent, coming off of a record-breaking $12.7 billion in 2014, with operating income down 29 percent at $3.613 billion, net earnings up 2 percent at $1.968 billion, and earnings per share up 4 percent at $2.00. Operating income was off 1 percent at $3.613 billion, and operating ratio was at 69.7 for its first full-year sub-70 operating ratio.

“Over the past five years, CSX has transformed its business to continue delivering solid results despite the global energy transition,” said Michael Ward, CSX president, chairman, and CEO, said on the company’s earnings call today.

That was made clear by the company’s fourth quarter coal revenues falling 38 percent to $449 million.

Ward added that the company’s solid full-year2015 performance was achieved despite the challenges in the energy market, low commodity prices, and the strong U.S. dollar that impacted many of its markets.

“[2015] revenue of $11.8 billion reflected growth in intermodal, automotive, and minerals, which partially offset the continued declines in coal,” he said. “Improving service, aligning resources and costs against a lower demand environment, and driving efficiency gains of more than $180 million helped generate operating income of nearly $3.6 billion and our first full-year operating ratio of under 70 percent.” 

Frank Lonegro, CSX executive vice president and chief financial officer, said on the call that the 13 percent decline in fourth quarter revenue was driven mainly by a $198 million decline in fuel surcharge recoveries and $175 million from the impact of lower volume.

Same store core pricing gains, which CSX defines as shipments with the same customer, commodity and car type, and same origin and destination, were up 4.1 percent annually in the fourth quarter, and merchandise and intermodal pricing was up 4.5 percent.

Lonegro said these gains were more than offset by the impacted of negative business mix, with coal driving the majority of the 6 percent quarterly volume decline.

“Low natural gas prices, coupled with the impact of significant flooding in South Carolina, impacted domestic coal volumes, while low commodity prices and the strong U.S. dollar challenged export coal in our merchandise markets,” he explained. “We continue to see strong core pricing.”

For the first quarter of 2016, Lonegro said CSX expects volumes to decline, with a challenging freight environment to continue, due to the headwinds associated with coal, low commodity prices, and a strong U.S. dollar are expected to more than offset market growth.

Ward added that CSX continues to deliver solid results for its shareholders despite the transformational declines in the energy environment challenging market conditions.

“2016 will be a more challenging year,” he said. “Volume for the first quarter and full-year will decline as growth in some markets continues to be offset by the significant impact of continued coal declines, low commodity prices and a strong U.S. dollar. We are taking necessary actions to manage our business in that environment, including making structural and network-wide changes to manage resources and costs with business demand, driving further efficiency gains, and remaining focused on strong pricing that reflects the value of CSX’ services.”

And Ward said that in response to the expected challenges in 2016 CSX has decreased its capital budget by more than $100 million, with the company expected to invest $2.4 billion this year as it remains committed to preserving safety, service, and efficiency for both customers and communities while positioning CSX for the future.

“As we look to the future, this company will continue to transition its business toward long-term profitable growth opportunities in the merchandise and intermodal markets,” explained Ward. “In that regard, we remain focused on achieving a mid-60s operating ratio longer-term as we execute our core strategy of meeting or exceeding customer needs to support strong pricing for the value of our rail service and continuously improving operational efficiency. With those efforts, we are confident that CSX will continue to be a preferred service provider for customers who face a growing population, a more integrated global economy, and the need for more reliable, more sustainable supply chains.”


Article Topics

CSX
Railroad Shipping
   All topics

News & Resources

Latest in Materials Handling

Beckhoff USA opens new office in Austin, Texas
Manhattan Associates selects TeamViewer as partner for warehouse vision picking
ASME Foundation wins grant for technical workforce development
The (Not So) Secret Weapons: How Key Cabinets and Asset Management Lockers Are Changing Supply Chain Operations
MODEX C-Suite Interview with Harold Vanasse: The perfect blend of automation and sustainability
Consultant and industry leader John M. Hill passes on at age 86
Registration open for Pack Expo International 2024
More Materials Handling

About the Author

Jeff Berman's avatar
Jeff Berman
Jeff Berman is Group News Editor for Logistics Management, Modern Materials Handling, and Supply Chain Management Review and is a contributor to Robotics 24/7. Jeff works and lives in Cape Elizabeth, Maine, where he covers all aspects of the supply chain, logistics, freight transportation, and materials handling sectors on a daily basis.
Follow Modern Materials Handling on FaceBook

Subscribe to Materials Handling Magazine

Subscribe today!
Not a subscriber? Sign up today!
Subscribe today. It's FREE.
Find out what the world's most innovative companies are doing to improve productivity in their plants and distribution centers.
Start your FREE subscription today.

Latest Resources

Materials Handling Robotics: The new world of heterogeneous robotic integration
In this Special Digital Edition, the editorial staff of Modern curates the best robotics coverage over the past year to help track the evolution of this piping hot market.
Case study: Optimizing warehouse space, performance and sustainability
Optimize Parcel Packing to Reduce Costs
More resources

Latest Resources

2023 Automation Study: Usage & Implementation of Warehouse/DC Automation Solutions
2023 Automation Study: Usage & Implementation of Warehouse/DC Automation Solutions
This research was conducted by Peerless Research Group on behalf of Modern Materials Handling to assess usage and purchase intentions forautomation systems...
How Your Storage Practices Can Affect Your Pest Control Program
How Your Storage Practices Can Affect Your Pest Control Program
Discover how your storage practices could be affecting your pest control program and how to prevent pest infestations in your business. Join...

Warehousing Outlook 2023
Warehousing Outlook 2023
2023 is here, and so are new warehousing trends.
Extend the Life of Brownfield Warehouses
Extend the Life of Brownfield Warehouses
Today’s robotic and data-driven automation systems can minimize disruptions and improve the life and productivity of warehouse operations.
Power Supply in Overhead Cranes: Energy Chains vs. Festoons
Power Supply in Overhead Cranes: Energy Chains vs. Festoons
Download this white paper to learn more about how both systems compare.