Recent Posts
- Supply chain software: Will we soon see an on-demand Tier 1 WMS from RedPrairie?
- Supply chain management: Oracle and E2open partner to turn a product into a solution
- Supply chain management: The last mile
- Supply chain management: Tough year in the 3PL market, but better days ahead
- Automated materials handling: The new untouchables
- RFID: Catching up with Mike Dempsey
- The economy: Sales are down and the Dow is up
- Green Supply Chain: Making the case for wooden pallets.
- Lean manufacturing: Want to get lean? Think casters.
- Materials handling automation: Behind the Diamond Phoenix/System Logistics merger
Recent Comments
- Jan Henricsson, Logimatic on Supply chain management: The last mile
- sprocket on Supply chain management: Oracle and E2open partner to turn a product into a solution
- macafee on What's the best order picking technology? It depends.
- wallmart on What's the best order picking technology? It depends.
- ContractorBids on Supply chain software: Retalix raises its profile
Most Commented On
- What’s the deal with network design? (14)
- Supply chain management: How big is your (carbon) footprint? Wal-Mart wants to know. (13)
- Chrysler implements the materials handling system of the future (7)
- How good is your supply chain management system? (5)
- Materials handling: Bare-knuckle brawling in the pallet industry (5)
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
Blog
The year of working efficiently in the supply chain.
January 29, 2008
According to the Chinese calendar, 2008 is the year of rat.
It’s fitting. Looking at the economy, I think I smell a rat. That’s why in materials handling, 2008 will be the year of efficiency, according to Susan Rider, president of Rider & Associates, a consulting firm, and a member of Modern’s advisory board.
“Based on what I’m hearing from users, companies are focused on getting more efficient and effective with their software, layout and designs,” Rider told me the other day. “They’re making sure that within the four walls, they have the most efficient tools to get the job done.”
Put aside a challenging economy. Even before business began to slow, Rider says she was seeing examples of the latest push for efficiency at work in the supply chain. Here are a few.
Globalization: Going off shore to reduce manufacturing costs is a familiar tale. The less-told tale is that the distribution supply chain now begins at the port. “We’re becoming a cross-docking supply chain,” says Rider. “Instead of shipping containers to a regional distribution center, we’re unloading and distributing right from the port.” Why is that efficient? Setting up a cross-dock center near the port allows you to bypass the DC and ship directly to the store in some instances; or to pre-allocate inventory before shipping it to a regional DC.
Simplify, simplify, simplify: The availability of labor continues to rise to the top. “Our warehouses and distribution centers are scrambling to find good workers,” says Rider. On the one hand, that’s driving companies to automate processes where the volumes justify the investment, and to make better use of software to manage processes behind the scenes. Think of it as idiot proofing the warehouse. Then, there’s the expanded use of technologies like pick-to-light that simplify picking. “With pick-to-light, the picker doesn’t have to think, they just have to count,” says Rider. Why is that efficient? More accurate picking means fewer returns.
Taking automation global: Emerging economies have traditionally relied on cheap labor rather than automation to get the job done. The workload increases; just throw a few more warm bodies at the problem. That doesn’t work in today’s complex supply chains. “Companies are beginning to take best warehousing practices, like automation, overseas where they’ve never had to think about automation in the past,” says Rider. Example: One major high tech electronics company just built an automated distribution center in Singapore that mirrors what they have in North America. Why is that efficient? With rising transportation costs, even low wages have to be controlled.
Quality counts: That is one of the lessons from the lead paint and food scares from last fall. “Before then, most companies had someone in charge of quality fly over once a month to check on conditions,” says Rider. “Now, they’re beginning to put quality assurance departments where the goods are manufactured.” Why is that efficient? It’s cheaper to create a QA department on site than to get stuck with a whole boat load of shirts with the collar button sewed in the wrong spot, as recently happened to one high-end shirt maker.
It’s time to upgrade: Tier I companies that implemented warehouse and transportation management systems 8 or 10 years ago have hit a wall. They’ve squeezed all the gains they’re going to squeeze out of those systems. Meanwhile, the competition is jumping ahead. “If you want to be more effective, you have to put in new systems,” says Rider. What’s the most important reason for a new system? Rider says it’s visibility. “I talked to a customer the other day that just implemented a new WMS,” she says. “They said they can now track an item all the way to the end customer. Before, they just guessed that it got there.” Why is that efficient? Better visibility means more accurate orders and less time on the phone dealing with customer service issues.
Tell us what your company is doing to get more efficient in 2008.
Posted by Bob Trebilcock on January 29, 2008 | Comments (0)





















