Recent Posts
- Supply chain software: Will we soon see an on-demand Tier 1 WMS from RedPrairie?
- Supply chain management: Oracle and E2open partner to turn a product into a solution
- Supply chain management: The last mile
- Supply chain management: Tough year in the 3PL market, but better days ahead
- Automated materials handling: The new untouchables
- RFID: Catching up with Mike Dempsey
- The economy: Sales are down and the Dow is up
- Green Supply Chain: Making the case for wooden pallets.
- Lean manufacturing: Want to get lean? Think casters.
- Materials handling automation: Behind the Diamond Phoenix/System Logistics merger
Recent Comments
- Jan Henricsson, Logimatic on Supply chain management: The last mile
- sprocket on Supply chain management: Oracle and E2open partner to turn a product into a solution
- macafee on What's the best order picking technology? It depends.
- wallmart on What's the best order picking technology? It depends.
- ContractorBids on Supply chain software: Retalix raises its profile
Most Commented On
- What’s the deal with network design? (14)
- Supply chain management: How big is your (carbon) footprint? Wal-Mart wants to know. (13)
- Chrysler implements the materials handling system of the future (7)
- How good is your supply chain management system? (5)
- Materials handling: Bare-knuckle brawling in the pallet industry (5)
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
Blog
What's the best order picking technology? It depends.
February 14, 2008
Earlier this week, I was sitting in the lobby of the Hampton Inn in Newark, New Jersey, talking shop with two warehouse guys from a major pharmaceutical company.
We were waiting for the shuttle bus to take us to a Knowledge Conference sponsored by AL Systems, a provider of paperless picking solutions (pick-to-light, voice, and RF) and warehouse control systems.
When I asked what brought them to Newark, one of the pair said they were in “proof of concept mode.” As it turns out, he was about to implement a warehouse management system in his facility and was there with his colleague to learn more about voice recognition and pick-to-light solutions.
Now, you would think the move from a paper-based picking system to a WMS-directed system would have my friend all fired up. After all, isn’t paper-picking old school, while a WMS is supposed to be the best solution to get the job done for a Fortune 500 company? But he was a little glum.
“We’re really good at paper-based picking,” he told me. He went on to list a number of reasons why doing it the old school way was still the best solution for his operation. It was clear he’d lost that battle.
It got me to thinking: Bells and whistles aside, what constitutes the best materials handling solution?
Turns out, that was the theme of the presentation that morning by Paul Lightfoot, CEO of AL Systems. Lightfoot compared voice, pick-to-light and fully-automated solutions in piece picking operations. Which was best? It depends. “I’m here to dispel the notion that there is a best technology,” Lightfoot said. “What’s best is a function of circumstances and can only be determined on a case-by-case analysis.”
If you’re a supplier to a major retailer like Wal-Mart, Target or Kohl’s, the best solution might be the one that delivers 99.9% accuracy to avoid charge backs.
On the other hand, if you’re a major retailer replenishing your own stores, a 95% accuracy rate might be good enough, allowing for a different solution.
How then, do you make that case-by-case analysis? Lightfoot provided several rules of thumb for best technology selection.
Identify the best criteria: Is accuracy, labor savings or increased productivity/throughput most important? Express the needed improvements in a spreadsheet. One metric Lightfoot likes to use is your present labor cost per unit.
Estimate investment costs: That’s not just the cost of installing the technology, but also the internal cost of operating and maintaining the technology, the total cost of ownership.
Forecast improvements: How will a given technology improve your labor cost per unit, improve your accuracy or impact your maintenance and IT costs?
Verify with site visits and references: Every salesperson worth his or her salt will tell a good story. Get references for customers with operations like yours and visit their locations to see the solution in action.
What’s the ROI: The key is to set realistic, quantifiable goals for a return on investment in advance of selection.
Put the ROI to the test: One way to do that is to find out what kind of ROI the reference customers achieved with their solution.
Follow those steps and answer those questions, Lightfoot said, and you’re going to figure which of the best technologies is best for your operation.
Have you been through a selection process lately? Let us know how you selected the best technology for your operations.
Posted by Bob Trebilcock on February 14, 2008 | Comments (2)
Reader Comments
at 10/20/2009 6:50:02 PM, wallmart commented:
Can not imagine how glad I am that got to your post
at 10/21/2009 10:10:36 AM, macafee commented:
Did you know that everything that you said mozhent be used against some people?





















