What Makes a Winning S&OP Program?

Although sales and operations planning (S&OP) has been practiced for several decades now, many companies still struggle to succeed with their programs. A big part of the problem is that the requisite building blocks to success are either faulty or lacking. The five success principles described here can get an S&OP program on the right track and delivering the kind of results expected.
image
By Singh Manoj K
May 07, 2010 - SCMR Editorial
Download Article PDF

There is simply no other word for it. The success rate for Sales & Operations Planning (S&OP) programs has been dismal. A third of all S&OP programs fail or produce unclear results.

That is one of the most worrying findings for a survey SCMR ran last year to better understand the impact of the recession from the viewpoints of supply chain executives.  The survey, conducted on behalf of IBM and Oracle, showed that about 40 percent of businesses don’t even have a formal S&OP program in place.  And it revealed some staggering gaps in the participation of different stakeholders where S&OP processes do exist.  Nearly half of the supply chain managers polled conceded that they run their S&OP meetings without regular participation form their companies’ manufacturing and finance departments. More than 50 percent do not involve anyone from marketing.

What’s going on? After all, the S&OP process was designed around close collaboration between such stakeholders. The concept is simple: By regularly getting those who have the most visibility of demand at the same table with those who have the best insights into constraints on the supply side, companies are supposed to be able to build better supply chain plans and to collaborate more effectively to implement those plans.

The idea is not new. It has been around since the 1980s. If done right, S&OP has the potential to significantly improve some key operational metrics. According to the research firm the Aberdeen Group, companies that demonstrate best-in-class S&OP have 91 percent complete order fill rates and logistics costs of as little as 6 percent of sales. And their gross margins average 43 percent.

So the basic question is this: Why don’t companies adopt this apparently simple concept?

SUBSCRIBERS: Click here to download PDF of the full article.


About the Author

Singh Manoj K

Subscribe to Modern Materials Handling magazine

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Find out what the world's most innovative companies are doing to improve productivity in their plants and distribution centers.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Recent Entries

Transportation & Logistics companies are winning customers and improving profitability by taking a fresh look at their operations. Don't miss this brand new ebook from Barcoding, Inc. and Honeywell, "Automating Transportation and Logistics: How automation and assessment programs are helping T&L companies cut costs, increase cash, and improve customer experience."

After 53 years in Jonesboro, Ark., the company will add new manufacturing capabilities and 75 permanent jobs.

Loscam, Asia Pacific’s leading pallet pooling service provider, recently opened a new depot in Kota Kinabalu, capital city of the state of Sabah Malaysia, further extending its services to East Malaysia.

The PMI, the ISM’s index to measure growth inched up 0.7 percent to 53.5 over May’s 52.8 (a PMI of 50 or greater represents growth). This reading marks sequential growth for the third month in a row.

More than 30 leading suppliers of reusable products and services will be available in the Reusable Packaging Pavilion. The exhibitors include manufacturers, material suppliers, providers of washing and other specialty equipment, and service providers of reusable packaging systems and solutions.

Comments

Post a comment
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.