MMH    Topics     News

Failed bid by UPS to acquire TNT is annulled by European General Court


Latest Material Handling News

Transportation and logistics bellwethers UPS and FedEx are in constant competition, whether it is in the air or on the road. That has been a constant for decades.

They also were in heavy competition for the rights to acquire TNT Express NV, a provider of mail and courier services and the fourth largest global parcel operator. FedEx eventually won that fight, officially bringing TNT into the fold for $4.8 billion in May 2016.

Getting to that point, though, was replete with many chapters, though. In 2012, TNT UPS for $6.8 billion, but the deal was squashed, following a formal decision from the European Commission, the executive body of the European Union, which prohibited the acquisition. Many of the EC’s concerns over the deal were due to the competitive parcel landscape in Europe. And FedEx being a distant fourth in Europe in terms of market share made attempts to stop the sale difficult. TNT had been looking for a buyer of its express business since 2010, when it split out its mail division. And UPS subsequently had to hand over $267 million Euro (roughly $344 million in U.S. dollars), because of prohibition by the European Commission and the Offer Condition relating to the EU Competition Clearance not being fulfilled and UPS paying TNT the and withdrawing the offer.

But fast-forwarding nearly four years later, it appears that the European Union’s decision is not what it previously was, when it led to FedEx eventually acquiring TNT.

The reason for this was laid out in a Reuters report published yesterday, which explained that after losing its bid for TNT, UPS challenged the EU’s decision at the general court, which resulted in the annulment of the EU decision made yesterday, due to what it called a procedural irregularity.

According to the report, the court said the Commission had infringed UPS's rights of defense by using a different econometric model in its analysis than that used in previous exchange of views and arguments.

"UPS might have been better able to defend itself if it had at its disposal, before the adoption of the contested decision, the final version of the econometric model chosen by the Commission," the court said in the report.

In comments provided to LM, UPS was diplomatic in regards to the court’s decision.

"UPS is pleased to see that its reasoning was upheld by the European General Court,” the company said. “While the decision in UPS’s favor makes a number of points, the most significant of this decision is its impact in helping to preserve a competitive environment in Europe by clarifying the procedure and relevant criteria for merger approval. UPS has operated in Europe for over 40 consecutive years and continues its investment program into its integrated global network in which Europe plays a key role.”

Even without having TNT in its stable, UPS remains committed to Europe, as evidenced by its January acquisition of Freightex, a provider of truckload, less-than-truckload, specialized, and refrigerated over-the-road services. At the time of that deal, UPS said that according to Grand View Research the European 3PL market was forecasted to hit $174 billion by the end of 2016.

And in March 2016, UPS said it had broken ground to expand its package sorting and delivery facility in Herne, Germany, an $80 million project that is expected to be completed by the end of 2017.


Article Topics

3PL
FedEx
Global Trade
Logistics
TNT
Transportation
UPS
   All topics

News & Resources

Latest in Materials Handling

Registration open for Pack Expo International 2024
Walmart chooses Swisslog AS/RS and software for third milk processing facility
NetLogistik partners with Vuzix subsidiary Moviynt to offer mobility solutions for warehouses
Materials Handling Robotics: The new world of heterogeneous robotic integration
BSLBATT is looking for new distributors and resellers worldwide
Lucas Watson appointed CSO for Körber’s Parcel Logistics business in North America
Hyster recognizes Dealers of Distinction for 2023
More Materials Handling

About the Author

Jeff Berman's avatar
Jeff Berman
Jeff Berman is Group News Editor for Logistics Management, Modern Materials Handling, and Supply Chain Management Review and is a contributor to Robotics 24/7. Jeff works and lives in Cape Elizabeth, Maine, where he covers all aspects of the supply chain, logistics, freight transportation, and materials handling sectors on a daily basis.
Follow Modern Materials Handling on FaceBook

Subscribe to Materials Handling Magazine

Subscribe today!
Not a subscriber? Sign up today!
Subscribe today. It's FREE.
Find out what the world's most innovative companies are doing to improve productivity in their plants and distribution centers.
Start your FREE subscription today.

Latest Resources

Materials Handling Robotics: The new world of heterogeneous robotic integration
In this Special Digital Edition, the editorial staff of Modern curates the best robotics coverage over the past year to help track the evolution of this piping hot market.
Case study: Optimizing warehouse space, performance and sustainability
Optimize Parcel Packing to Reduce Costs
More resources

Latest Resources

2023 Automation Study: Usage & Implementation of Warehouse/DC Automation Solutions
2023 Automation Study: Usage & Implementation of Warehouse/DC Automation Solutions
This research was conducted by Peerless Research Group on behalf of Modern Materials Handling to assess usage and purchase intentions forautomation systems...
How Your Storage Practices Can Affect Your Pest Control Program
How Your Storage Practices Can Affect Your Pest Control Program
Discover how your storage practices could be affecting your pest control program and how to prevent pest infestations in your business. Join...

Warehousing Outlook 2023
Warehousing Outlook 2023
2023 is here, and so are new warehousing trends.
Extend the Life of Brownfield Warehouses
Extend the Life of Brownfield Warehouses
Today’s robotic and data-driven automation systems can minimize disruptions and improve the life and productivity of warehouse operations.
Power Supply in Overhead Cranes: Energy Chains vs. Festoons
Power Supply in Overhead Cranes: Energy Chains vs. Festoons
Download this white paper to learn more about how both systems compare.