Subscribe to our free, weekly email newsletter!


Casebook 2011: Stretch-wrap prototype passes its first test at Buffalo Rock Co.

Soft drink bottler gambles on new stretch wrapping technology and wins uptime lottery.
By Josh Bond, Associate Editor
January 10, 2011

Family owned Buffalo Rock Co., an Alabama-based Pepsi bottler, has the flexibility to make quick decisions. When given the opportunity to try-out an alpha model of a new stretch-wrapping machine (Lantech, 800-866-0322, http://www.lantech.com) in 2008, the company took the offer. After the new machine eliminated line stoppages and operator intervention, easily handled damaged film rolls, and increased overall film yield, Buffalo Rock knew it had made the right choice.

The key development in the new machine was a patented system that prevented film breakages. Far from being a source of trouble, the machine was so predictable that operators would often ignore the machine until it was time to reload it with the scuffed or partial rolls of film that usually caused stoppages on other stretch wrapping machines.

“The most important issue with any stretch wrapper is consistent output,” says George Garrison, general manager of manufacturing at Buffalo Rock. “Any stoppage requires immediate response from the operators. That’s just been a non-issue with this particular machine, and a first in our plant.”

With the new stretch wrapper, the plant has cut film costs while gaining valuable data. The machine is rated at 60 to 80 pallets per hour, but is available with a high-speed option for 80 to 100 pallets per hour. As it wraps, the machine monitors capacity versus true utilization, stoppages for starvation, blockage or film break, loads wrapped per hour, shift, day, week and month, and loads wrapped per roll of film. The control also reports how many pallets can be wrapped with the film remaining on the roll, allowing operators to budget their time efficiently for reloading. The machine easily consumes the film down to the roll core without any usual end-of-roll tears.

About the Author

image
Josh Bond
Associate Editor

Josh Bond is an associate editor to Modern. Josh was formerly Modern’s lift truck columnist and contributing editor, has a degree in Journalism from Keene State College and has studied business management at Franklin Pierce.


Subscribe to Modern Materials Handling magazine

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Find out what the world’s most innovative companies are doing to improve productivity in their plants and distribution centers.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Recent Entries

Parent company's Logistics & Automation Division began servicing North American customers in 1962, 12 years before Murata machinery was established.

Pack Expo and Pharma Expo to draw 2,400 exhibitors in more than 1.2 million net square feet of exhibit space.

Cloud-based manufacturing execution systems grant visibility into centralized or global manufacturing environments.

In-plant trailers represent a tried and true method of moving materials through plants safely and efficiently. While trailers look alike at first glance, there are some significant differences that greatly affect performance and cost. The wise purchaser will study the differences and select the system that makes the best sense for the specific application. This complimentary white paper addresses the most important design factors to consider when specifying in-plant trailers.

Very often companies debate needing a new WMS or just muddling through while constantly adding to the List. The List is that set of notes that operations people wish their WMS could do. Every operation has their unique items, things their business requires that their WMS system doesn't do, or does poorly. This white paper reviews how to extend a WMS to allow the List to become a thing of the past.



© Copyright 2013 Peerless Media LLC, a division of EH Publishing, Inc • 111 Speen Street, Ste 200, Framingham, MA 01701 USA