Ocean cargo: The Shipping Act of 2010 signals end to cartels
The bill also will empower the FMC to mediate contract disputes…something shippers have long waited for
Latest NewsIncrease Efficiency and Profits with Smarter Logistics Planning Armstrong report points to continued increase in 3PL usage by shippers CBRE data shows changing trends for logistics and industrial real estate in the Americas APICS to update industry recognized SCOR model in its 20th year XPO Logistics touts benefits of investments in LTL driver training initiatives More News
Latest ResourceEvaluating Goods-to-Person Technologies This white paper overviews the various, self-contained, goods-to-person AS/RS systems available for handling the totes, cases and eaches most frequently faced by e-commerce order fulfillment operations, and the typical applications for each.
As widely expected, the Federal Maritime Commission is likely to be given more authority next year to end ocean carrier pricing collusion.
The Shipping Act of 2010, introduced by Rep. James L. Oberstar, D-Minn., yesterday will abolish carrier antitrust immunity and prevent carrier executives from convening so-called “discussion groups” used to formalize rate strategy.
The bill also will empower the FMC to mediate contract disputes…something shippers have long waited for.
“The carrier’s freewheeling market share approach to contracts is what took rates down in the first place,” said Jon Monroe, president of Monroe Consulting in Shanghai. “But the real frustration was the lack of communication and the lack of a real partnership.”
As reported in LM, a draft of this bill had been endorsed by a large coalition of shippers this summer. U.S. exporters of agricultural goods had been especially vocal in their support of legislation that might also encourage carriers to provide more containers for westbound deployment.
Oberstar, chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, apparently had been listening.
“Even under the current regulatory scheme, immunity for agreements has long outlived its usefulness,” he said in a statement.
Michael Berzon, chairman of the National Industrial Transportation League’s ocean committee, told LM last month that U.S.shippers were making a compelling argument.
“If enacted, the end of the limited anti-trust immunity would follow the action taken by European regulators,” he said. “Since the elimination of the EU Block Exemption, it prohibits consultation by groups of carriers to discuss rates in the European trades.”
About the AuthorPatrick Burnson, Executive Editor Patrick Burnson is executive editor for Logistics Management and Supply Chain Management Review magazines and web sites. Patrick is a widely-published writer and editor who has spent most of his career covering international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He lives and works in San Francisco, providing readers with a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. You can reach him directly at [email protected]
Subscribe to Modern Materials Handling Magazine!Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Find out what the world’s most innovative companies are doing to improve productivity in their plants and distribution centers.
Start your FREE subscription today!
Top 20 Worldwide Materials Handling Systems Suppliers 2017 ERP Suppliers’ Changing Role View More From this Issue