MMH    Topics 

Transportation and Logistics M&A in Good Shape through First Three Quarters of 2015

While third quarter transportation and logistics merger and acquisition (M&A) activity saw a decline, year-to-date deal making matched up well with recent years as deal value for the first nine months of 2015 hit its highest level going back to 2006, according to data issued by PwC this week.


Deals cited by PwC in its data report represent all announced deals for the quarter-as opposed to completed deals only-and the report does not parse out deals that are withdrawn, intended, or pending, and only deals valued at $50 million or more are included.

PwC said in the third quarter there were 44 transportation and logistics transactions valued at $50 million or more for a total value of $28.8 billion, which represented a 30 percent decline in deal volume and a 27 percent decline in deal value compared to the second quarter of this year and a 28 percent decline in deal volume and a 36 percent gain in deal value, due to average deal size increasing over the last four quarters, said PwC.

On a year-to-date basis, deal-making activity was steady annually, with value shooting up 55 percent compared to the same period a year ago from $63.1 billion to $97.9 billion.

In the third quarter, there were six megadeals, which PwC said are deals valued at $1 billion or more, cumulatively valued at $18.3 billion and accounting for 63 percent of total third quarter deal value.

PwC said these deals were spurred on by companies trying to increase scale, enhance operations, build transportation networks, and expand geographic reach.

Some other notable takeaways of the report included:
Launch the data explorer on this page for a deeper dive into the data

  • Cross-border expansion was a key driver particularly in advanced economies, with more than half (55 percent) of the deals involved trans-national activity, and strategic investors looking to build a global transportation network and expand operations were involved in 48 percent of all cross-border deals for the quarter (and 52 percent of overall deal activity for the quarter);
  • Financial investor activity was up to nearly 48 percent compared to 44 percent in the second quarter;
  • Logistics companies represented 23 percent of T&L activity in the third quarter and that trend is expected to continue growing; and
  • Marine shipping and related services deals drove more than a third of the quarter’s volume at 34 percent compared to 13 percent in the second quarter


PwC U.S. Transportation and Logistics Leader Jonathan Kletzel told Logistics Management there have been various drivers for the gains in deal volume and value in recent quarters.

“Despite a dip in deal activity in the third quarter, we continue to see interest in transportation and logistics M&A from companies across the board including logistics, trucking, shipping and other sub-sectors,” he said. “While executives may have pushed the pause button in the third quarter following a recent surge in consolidation over the last several quarters, activity for the year as a whole remains robust. In fact, in the first nine months of the year, T&L companies have already surpassed the total deal value for all of 2014.”

PwC U.S Transportation and Logistics Leader Jonathan Kletzel

“In the first nine months of the year, T&L companies have already surpassed the total deal value for all of 2014”Jonathan Kletzel, PwC U.S Transportation and Logistics Leader

When asked what is driving the traction behind regional/local market deal-making activity, Kletzel said that, as in previous quarters, Asia and Oceania is the region that has accounted for the largest portion of deal activity - driven largely by the level of activity in China (half of the region’s deals).

In the past, he said PwC has seen the geographic focus on deal activity shift toward emerging markets such as China where there is still significant room for consolidation in sectors such as shipping and maritime services and logistics providers.

“A majority of the deals in this region tend to be local-market transactions, allowing companies to focus on strengthening their core businesses while emphasizing cost synergies given the tendency for overlap in transportation networks and existing operations,” he explained. “As China’s economy continues to expand, we expect to see these deals continue as companies seek opportunities for inorganic growth.”

As for cross-border activity, he noted that many of the completed cross-border transactions in the third quarter were intended to build a global transportation network and expand international operations and PwC expects to see this trend continue with advanced economy acquirers as they look to purchase more foreign entities in higher growth countries, coupled with expecting more emerging market acquirers to participate in trans-national activity as they grow large enough to begin to see merger opportunities internationally.

Recent: Transportation and Logistics Mergers & Acquisitions


Article Topics

   All topics

PwC News & Resources

PwC and MAPI release survey on state of IoT in manufacturing
ELFA survey of equipment finance activity reports new business volume grew 12.4% in 2015
Manufacturers turn cautious on global economic outlook, according to PwC US survey
PWC report: Economic sentiment among manufacturers softens
How omni-channel challenges impact costs, revenues and responsibilities
PwC US: Manufacturers remain optimistic despite growing concerns around strong U.S. dollar
Industrial manufacturing M&A value skyrockets past historic levels
More PwC

Latest in Materials Handling

Ergonomics Update: Hearing protection in the warehouse
Parcel handling on the move
An inside look at picking technologies
April Services PMI contracts following 15 months of growth, reports ISM
Where rack meets automation
Comau’s Advanced Solutions Drive The Benefits Of Automation For Diversified Industries
Toyota Industries Corporation launches Toyota Automated Logistics Group to house acquired companies
More Materials Handling

About the Author

Jeff Berman's avatar
Jeff Berman
Jeff Berman is Group News Editor for Logistics Management, Modern Materials Handling, and Supply Chain Management Review and is a contributor to Robotics 24/7. Jeff works and lives in Cape Elizabeth, Maine, where he covers all aspects of the supply chain, logistics, freight transportation, and materials handling sectors on a daily basis.
Follow Modern Materials Handling on FaceBook

Subscribe to Materials Handling Magazine

Subscribe today!
Not a subscriber? Sign up today!
Subscribe today. It's FREE.
Find out what the world's most innovative companies are doing to improve productivity in their plants and distribution centers.
Start your FREE subscription today.

Latest Resources

Materials Handling Robotics: The new world of heterogeneous robotic integration
In this Special Digital Edition, the editorial staff of Modern curates the best robotics coverage over the past year to help track the evolution of this piping hot market.
Case study: Optimizing warehouse space, performance and sustainability
Optimize Parcel Packing to Reduce Costs
More resources

Latest Resources

2023 Automation Study: Usage & Implementation of Warehouse/DC Automation Solutions
2023 Automation Study: Usage & Implementation of Warehouse/DC Automation Solutions
This research was conducted by Peerless Research Group on behalf of Modern Materials Handling to assess usage and purchase intentions forautomation systems...
How Your Storage Practices Can Affect Your Pest Control Program
How Your Storage Practices Can Affect Your Pest Control Program
Discover how your storage practices could be affecting your pest control program and how to prevent pest infestations in your business. Join...

Warehousing Outlook 2023
Warehousing Outlook 2023
2023 is here, and so are new warehousing trends.
Extend the Life of Brownfield Warehouses
Extend the Life of Brownfield Warehouses
Today’s robotic and data-driven automation systems can minimize disruptions and improve the life and productivity of warehouse operations.
Power Supply in Overhead Cranes: Energy Chains vs. Festoons
Power Supply in Overhead Cranes: Energy Chains vs. Festoons
Download this white paper to learn more about how both systems compare.